Difference between Sections 34, 109 and 120 (B) of IPC – Explained!

Section 34 embodies the principle of joint liability in the doing of a criminal act, the essence of that liability being the existence of a common intention. Participation in the commission of the offence in furtherance of the common intention of all invites its application.

Image Source: images.flatworldknowledge.com

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Section 109, on the other hand, may be attracted even if the abettor is not present when the offence abetted is committed provided that he has instigated the commission of the offence or has engaged with one or more other persons in a conspiracy to commit an offence and pursuant to that conspiracy some act or illegal commission taken place or has intentionally aided the commission of an offence by an act or illegal omission.

ADVERTISEMENTS:

Criminal conspiracy differs from other offences in that mere agreement is made an offence even if no step is taken to carry out that agreement. Though, there is close association of conspiracy with incitement and abetment, the substantive offence of criminal conspiracy is somewhat wider in amplitude than abetment by conspiracy as contemplated by Section 107 of the Code.

A conspiracy from its very nature is hatched in secret. It is, therefore, extremely rare that direct evidence in proof of conspiracy can be forthcoming from wholly disinterested quarters or from utter strangers.

x

Hi!
I'm Jack!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out