Summary of the leading case Tagore v. Tagore (1872) 9 Beng. L.R. 337 I.A. Sup. Vol. 47: 13 WR 45.
Prasanna Kumar Tagore died leaving considerable properties. He left the only son Ganendra Mohan Tagore, the plaintiff. Image Source: upload.wikimedia.org ADVERTISEMENTS: After making provisions for the maintenance of his son, he proceeded to vest the whole property both ancestral and self acquired in trustees and bequeathed the beneficial interest in the following manner:1. Jitendra Mohan for life.2. Jitendra’s eldest son for life, born during the testator’s life-time.At the death of the testator, Jitendra had no sons. Surendra was alive. ADVERTISEMENTS: The main objections of the plaintiff were as follows:(1) It was invalid as to the ancestral estate.(2) The grant of the mere life-estate is illegal in Hindu Law.(3) The grant to Jitendra’s unborn son is invalid. ADVERTISEMENTS: (4) Every other grant after this invalid.(5) The creation of the trust is…